California Ripple Effect: June 2008

Friday, June 27, 2008

Presidential candidates weigh-in on California marriage ban

The campaign trying to ban the freedom to marry in California has reportedly received an e-mail from presidential candidate John McCain supporting their attempt to define marriage “as a unique institution between a man and a woman."

It looks like we’re starting to get a clearer picture of what a McCain presidency would look like.

McCain has recently been reaching out more to conservative evangelical voters, and has promised he will speak out more on “social issues” like his opposition to the freedom to marry.

Though McCain may have supported a marriage ban in his home state, Arizona’s senate has just rejected a measure to put an anti-marriage amendment on the ballot.

Barack Obama, on the other hand, “opposes all divisive and discriminatory constitutional amendments - whether it's a proposed amendment to the California and Florida Constitutions or the U.S. Constitution.” Though he stops just short of supporting the freedom to marry he sure doesn’t seem to be getting in anyone’s way.

The campaign trying to ban the freedom to marry in California has reportedly received an <a style="font-family: verdana;" href="http://www.washblade.com/thelatest/thelatest.cfm?blog_id=19352">e-mail from presidential candidate John McCain</a> supporting their attempt to define marriage “as a unique institution between a man and a woman." It looks like we’re starting to get a clearer picture of what a McCain presidency would look like. McCain has recently been <a href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/06/26/1171065.aspx">reaching out more to conservative evangelical voters</a>, and has promised he will speak out more on “social issues” like his opposition to the freedom to marry. Though McCain may have supported a marriage ban in his home state, <a href="http://www.tucsoncitizen.com/ss/local/89290.phphttp://">Arizona’s senate has just rejected a measure to put an anti-marriage amendment on the ballot.</a> Barack Obama, on the other hand, “<a href="http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/jcitron/gG5NDz">opposes all divisive and discriminatory constitutional amendments</a> - whether it's a proposed amendment to the California and Florida Constitutions or the U.S. Constitution.” Though he stops just short of supporting the freedom to marry he sure doesn’t seem to be getting in anyone’s way.

Larry Craig, David Vitter introduce ANOTHER anti-marriage amendment

It’s back.

This has to be seen to be believed.

Family values heroes Larry “wide stance” Craig and David “Canal Street Madam” Vitter are courageously reigniting a failed effort to write discrimination into the US constitution and harm LGBT families any way they can.

When will they quit?

Anti-marriage ballot initiative will be called Proposition 8

California Secretary of State, Debra Bowen has assigned numbers for the initiatives on the November 4 ballot. It’s sure easy to hate Proposition 8.

This is an attack on the fundamental freedom to marry. Tell everyone you know to vote NO on 8.

Thursday, June 26, 2008

Kuehl does no harm but indeed does good

It was a frantic week in the Legislature, with the deadline for bills to pass out of policy committees in the second house falling on June 30. Last night, the Senate Health Committee, chaired by Senator Sheila James Kuehl, burned the midnight oil to wrap up its last hearing of the session. Notably, it was also its last hearing with Senator Kuehl sitting as Chair.

Prominent on the dais was a sign that read “Do No Harm.” Senator Kuehl has made it a practice to display this mantra at each hearing of this committee struggling with big questions about how to fix California’s broken health care system. Agree or disagree with her single payer health care legislation, Senator Kuehl has been a stalwart champion for this cause. Her promise to “do no harm” belies a deep commitment to protect the most vulnerable among us, as the state grapples with health care reform and devastating budget cuts to key health programs.

At the close of the hearing last night, several committee members paid homage to Kuehl as the outgoing Chair. I was particularly moved by the remarks of Senator Sam Aanestad, the Republican Vice Chair and a doctor from Grass Valley, who said that in 10-plus years serving on health committees, he’s never worked with a chair so efficient, effective and fair-minded as Kuehl.

Through leaders like Sheila Kuehl, the LGBT community has achieved a certain brand of equality that often goes unnoticed. We haven’t managed to pick up many Republican votes on LGBT equality bills since the time Kuehl arrived in Sacramento as the first openly LGBT legislator in California. However, through the integrity, professionalism and collegiality of our LGBT Caucus, we have earned admiration and respect from across the aisle.

Kuehl in particular is known for her enduring fairness on policy matters toward all her colleagues, even the ones who’ve vehemently opposed equality for the LGBT community. On many occasions, I’ve witnessed her lend a helping hand in committee to members who were struggling with their own bills. And she does not discriminate in the manner that she offers her insights. Through graciousness, smarts and charisma, Sheila Kuehl has made an indelible mark. She’s proven, as she once said in defense of her LGBT-inclusive curriculum bill that, “a gay person could do something good.”

:: Alice Kessler is the Director of Government Affairs for Equality California.

<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_0b9Ihzs8eZM/SGQMi2J9XWI/AAAAAAAAATM/VZ34Xbf3BYo/s1600-h/SHEILA%2520KUEHL%2520150X175.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_0b9Ihzs8eZM/SGQMi2J9XWI/AAAAAAAAATM/VZ34Xbf3BYo/s400/SHEILA%2520KUEHL%2520150X175.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5216308061194247522" border="0" /></a> It was a frantic week in the Legislature, with the deadline for bills to pass out of policy committees in the second house falling on June 30. Last night, the Senate Health Committee, chaired by Senator Sheila James Kuehl, burned the midnight oil to wrap up its last hearing of the session. Notably, it was also its last hearing with Senator Kuehl sitting as Chair. Prominent on the dais was a sign that read “Do No Harm.” Senator Kuehl has made it a practice to display this mantra at each hearing of this committee struggling with big questions about how to fix California’s broken health care system. Agree or disagree with her single payer health care legislation, Senator Kuehl has been a stalwart champion for this cause. Her promise to “do no harm” belies a deep commitment to protect the most vulnerable among us, as the state grapples with health care reform and devastating budget cuts to key health programs. At the close of the hearing last night, several committee members paid homage to Kuehl as the outgoing Chair. I was particularly moved by the remarks of Senator Sam Aanestad, the Republican Vice Chair and a doctor from Grass Valley, who said that in 10-plus years serving on health committees, he’s never worked with a chair so efficient, effective and fair-minded as Kuehl. Through leaders like Sheila Kuehl, the LGBT community has achieved a certain brand of equality that often goes unnoticed. We haven’t managed to pick up many Republican votes on LGBT equality bills since the time Kuehl arrived in Sacramento as the first openly LGBT legislator in California. However, through the integrity, professionalism and collegiality of our LGBT Caucus, we have earned admiration and respect from across the aisle. Kuehl in particular is known for her enduring fairness on policy matters toward all her colleagues, even the ones who’ve vehemently opposed equality for the LGBT community. On many occasions, I’ve witnessed her lend a helping hand in committee to members who were struggling with their own bills. And she does not discriminate in the manner that she offers her insights. Through graciousness, smarts and charisma, Sheila Kuehl has made an indelible mark. She’s proven, as she once said in defense of her LGBT-inclusive curriculum bill that, “a gay person could do something good.” <blockquote><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_0b9Ihzs8eZM/SGQMFCch01I/AAAAAAAAAS8/7w4QOggo4Ag/s1600-h/ALICE%2520KESSLER.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer; width: 85px; height: 128px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_0b9Ihzs8eZM/SGQMFCch01I/AAAAAAAAAS8/7w4QOggo4Ag/s200/ALICE%2520KESSLER.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5216307549097284434" border="0" /></a> :: Alice Kessler is the Director of Government Affairs for Equality California.</blockquote>

Pro-LGBT bills making their way through the California legislature

Keep the momentum going.

There's been a flurry of activity with EQCA-sponsored legislation as of late. Bills protecting seniors and youth, modernizing anti-discrimination laws, and establishing the first state holiday commemorating an LGBT historical figure, have all passed hurdles steadily on their way to being written into law.

Last week the Senate Education Committee passed Mark Leno's Assembly Bill 2567, which would make May 22 into a day of special significance honoring Harvey Milk, one of the first openly-gay politicians in world history, a hero of the Gay Liberation movement, and a pioneer of LGBT equality. Next stop, a vote on the senate floor, then back to the assembly for a concurrence vote, and then on to the Governor's desk!

Lawrence King was another family-member who was taken before his time. In response to his tragedy, Julia Brownley authored Assembly Bill 3015 which would require programs that serve foster youth like Larry to educate them about their rights and about resources for LGBT students. The Protections for Foster Youth bill has passed the Senate Human Services Committee and now moves on to the Senate Appropriations Committee.

At any age, equality is essential for a safe and fulfilling life. Carole Migden's Senate Bill 1729 would protect seniors from isolation, discrimination, and bias at care facilities and nursing homes, by requiring awareness and sensitivity training for healthcare professionals about issues facing the LGBT community. Many LGBT seniors in particular rely on these facilities due to a lifetime of marginalization and a lack of social safety nets. Furthermore, LGBT seniors often face documented incidents of discrimination, including being denied the right to hospital visitation or to room with a loved one. The Assembly Health Committee passed the bill, along with the Senate, and now it awaits approval by the full Assembly.

Everyone would benefit from the success of a long-term effort, spearheaded by Assemblymember John Laird and EQCA, to modernize the state's existing anti-discrimination laws, ensuring they are truly comprehensive. The long overdue Assembly Bill 2654 just passed the Senate Judiciary Committee. Keep it up!

Unfortunately, even when pro-equality legislation gets passed into law, it's often a target for attacks. Thankfully, a push to overthrow essential protections for LGBT youth has just failed for a second time. Readers may remember Senate Bill 777, which was slandered with all sorts of vicious (though often hilarious) lies and mischaracterizations about what it would do to California public schools. The actual scope of SB 777 was to reinforce and clarify existing protections already guaranteed by law. The next threat to these youth protections is a dubious lawsuit filed by anti-LGBT groups with the Superior Court of California, San Diego. The State judicial system has protected civil rights in the past, and there is every reason to trust they will do the same in this case.

Keep the momentum going. There's been a flurry of activity with EQCA-sponsored legislation as of late. Bills protecting seniors and youth, modernizing anti-discrimination laws, and establishing the first state holiday commemorating an LGBT historical figure, have all passed hurdles steadily on their way to being written into law. Last week the Senate Education Committee passed Mark Leno's Assembly Bill 2567, which would <a href="http://www.eqca.org/site/apps/nlnet/content2.aspx?c=kuLRJ9MRKrH&b=4026197&ct=5545495">make May 22 into a day of special significance honoring Harvey Milk</a>, one of the first openly-gay politicians in world history, a hero of the Gay Liberation movement, and a pioneer of LGBT equality. Next stop, a vote on the senate floor, then back to the assembly for a concurrence vote, and then on to the Governor's desk! Lawrence King was another family-member who was taken before his time. In response to his tragedy, Julia Brownley authored Assembly Bill 3015 which would <a href="http://www.eqca.org/site/apps/nlnet/content2.aspx?c=kuLRJ9MRKrH&b=4026197&ct=5599181">require programs that serve foster youth like Larry to educate them about their rights</a> and about resources for LGBT students. The Protections for Foster Youth bill has passed the Senate Human Services Committee and now moves on to the Senate Appropriations Committee. At any age, equality is essential for a safe and fulfilling life. Carole Migden's Senate Bill 1729 would <a href="http://www.eqca.org/site/apps/nlnet/content2.aspx?c=kuLRJ9MRKrH&b=4026197&ct=5610185">protect seniors from isolation, discrimination, and bias at care facilities and nursing homes</a>, by requiring awareness and sensitivity training for healthcare professionals about issues facing the LGBT community. Many LGBT seniors in particular rely on these facilities due to a lifetime of marginalization and a lack of social safety nets. Furthermore, LGBT seniors often face documented incidents of discrimination, including being denied the right to hospital visitation or to room with a loved one. The Assembly Health Committee passed the bill, along with the Senate, and now it awaits approval by the full Assembly. Everyone would benefit from the success of a long-term effort, spearheaded by Assemblymember John Laird and EQCA, to <a href="http://www.eqca.org/site/apps/nlnet/content2.aspx?c=kuLRJ9MRKrH&b=4026197&ct=5610183">modernize the state's existing anti-discrimination laws</a>, ensuring they are truly comprehensive. The long overdue Assembly Bill 2654 just passed the Senate Judiciary Committee. Keep it up! Unfortunately, even when pro-equality legislation gets passed into law, it's often a target for attacks. Thankfully, a <a href="http://www.eqca.org/site/apps/nlnet/content2.aspx?c=kuLRJ9MRKrH&b=4026197&ct=5599171">push to overthrow essential protections for LGBT youth has just failed</a> for a second time. Readers may remember Senate Bill 777, which was slandered with all sorts of vicious (though often hilarious) lies and mischaracterizations about what it would do to California public schools. The actual scope of SB 777 was to reinforce and clarify existing protections already guaranteed by law. The next threat to these youth protections is a dubious lawsuit filed by anti-LGBT groups with the Superior Court of California, San Diego. The State judicial system has protected civil rights in the past, and there is every reason to trust they will do the same in this case.

Wednesday, June 25, 2008

Midweek marriage round-up

:: Kern County Clerk’s excuses for banning all marriage ceremonies fall flat. The problems Ann Barnett cited had existed prior to June 17, and could have been solved easily. The much anticipated rush of marriage licenses, so many that they would supposedly have rushed her office, never happened. She has also fired her lawyer and hired one from an anti-LGBT organization.

:: Marine and purple heart-winner just wants to get married. This opinion piece by Connie Schultz asks why someone who gave everything for their country is relegated to second-class citizenship?

:: Marriage is back in the courts in New York. After an anti-LGBT legal group challenged Governor Patterson’s decision to honor the marriages of same-gender couples performed out-of-state, an appeals court in Brooklyn heard oral arguments, but seemed unconvinced.

"We have no positive declaration here in the state of New York — and we haven't had for a hundred years — against same-sex marriage,"
--Judge Thomas Dickerson

Still the court may decide that earlier judgments determining that same-gender couples have no guaranteed constitutional right to marry may limit the ability of New York to recognize this particular kind of out-of-state “contract.” Fingers crossed!

:: Orange County Register supports the freedom to marry. In a round about kind of way. Still, the OC will be a key battleground come November. Hopefully this will help push support over the tipping point.

:: As cynical as it is to blame the freedom to marry for lost elections, Mark
Mellman shows why this logic is faulty, anyway, and why anti-marriage referendums this election season probably won’t affect other races.

:: A beautiful column by Jonathan Rauch about why the freedom to marry is good for America:

“Re-enter your childhood, but imagine your first crush, first kiss, first date and first sexual encounter, all bereft of any hope of marriage as a destination for your feelings. Re-enter your first serious relationship, but think about it knowing that marrying the person is out of the question.

“Imagine that in the law's eyes you and your soul mate will never be more than acquaintances. And now add even more strangeness. Imagine coming of age into a whole community, a whole culture, without marriage and the bonds of mutuality and kinship that go with it…

“…Marriage, remember, is not just a contract between two people. It is a contract that two people make, as a couple, with their community – which is why there is always a witness.” Read.

:: Kern County Clerk’s <a href="http://www.bakersfield.com/1439/story/478361.html">excuses for banning all marriage ceremonies fall flat</a>. The problems Ann Barnett cited had existed prior to June 17, and could have been solved easily. The much anticipated rush of marriage licenses, so many that they would supposedly have rushed her office, never happened. She has also fired her lawyer and hired one from an anti-LGBT organization. :: Marine and <a href="http://www.cleveland.com/living/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/living-0/121438267065780.xml&coll=2&thispage=1">purple heart-winner just wants to get married</a>. This opinion piece by Connie Schultz asks why someone who gave everything for their country is relegated to second-class citizenship? :: Marriage is <a href="http://www.nysun.com/new-york/gay-marriage-recognition-appears-close/80583/">back in the courts in New York.</a> After an anti-LGBT legal group challenged Governor Patterson’s decision to honor the marriages of same-gender couples performed out-of-state, an appeals court in Brooklyn heard oral arguments, but seemed unconvinced. <blockquote>"We have no positive declaration here in the state of New York — and we haven't had for a hundred years — against same-sex marriage," --Judge Thomas Dickerson</blockquote> Still the court may decide that earlier judgments determining that same-gender couples have no guaranteed constitutional right to marry may limit the ability of New York to recognize this particular kind of out-of-state “contract.” Fingers crossed! :: <a href="http://www.ocregister.com/articles/marriage-state-sex-2073700-marriages-people">Orange County Register supports the freedom to marry.</a> In a round about kind of way. Still, the OC will be a key battleground come November. Hopefully this will help push support over the tipping point. :: As cynical as it is to blame the freedom to marry for lost elections, Mark Mellman shows why this logic is faulty, anyway, and why <a href="http://thehill.com/mark-mellman/gay-marriage-redux-2008-06-24.html">anti-marriage referendums this election season probably won’t affect other races</a>. :: A beautiful column by Jonathan Rauch about why the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121400362307993399.html?mod=dist_smartbrief">freedom to marry is good for America</a>: <blockquote>“Re-enter your childhood, but imagine your first crush, first kiss, first date and first sexual encounter, all bereft of any hope of marriage as a destination for your feelings. Re-enter your first serious relationship, but think about it knowing that marrying the person is out of the question. “Imagine that in the law's eyes you and your soul mate will never be more than acquaintances. And now add even more strangeness. Imagine coming of age into a whole community, a whole culture, without marriage and the bonds of mutuality and kinship that go with it… “…Marriage, remember, is not just a contract between two people. It is a contract that two people make, as a couple, with their community – which is why there is always a witness.” <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121400362307993399.html?mod=dist_smartbrief">Read.</a></blockquote><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121400362307993399.html?mod=dist_smartbrief"></a>

Tuesday, June 24, 2008

Pew Study shows Americans’ religious beliefs more open toward lesbians and gays

Religious attitudes in America toward lesbians and gays appear to be shifting for the better. A national study looking into religious life showed that 50% of Americans feel that lesbians and gays should be accepted by society, and only 40% think that “homosexuality should be discouraged.”

Tolerance and pluralism seem to be even stronger in California, with 59% of Californians feeling that lesbians and gays should be accepted.

Once again, California leads the way.

Nationwide, a majority of Americans feel that there is more than one way to interpret the teachings of their respective religions. With more and more religious leaders and people of faith coming out every day in their support for the freedom to marry, this may be the beginning of an even more significant opening of hearts and minds.

Religious attitudes in America toward lesbians and gays appear to be shifting for the better. A national study looking into religious life showed that <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2008/06/24/americans_see_truth_in_a_range_of_faiths_massive_study_finds/?page=1">50% of Americans feel that lesbians and gays should be accepted by society</a>, and only 40% think that “homosexuality should be discouraged.” Tolerance and pluralism seem to be even stronger in California, with <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-faith24-2008jun24,0,1417534.story">59% of Californians feeling that lesbians and gays should be accepted</a>. Once again, California leads the way. Nationwide, a majority of Americans feel that there is more than one way to interpret the teachings of their respective religions. With more and more religious leaders and people of faith coming out every day in their support for the freedom to marry, this may be the beginning of an even more significant opening of hearts and minds.

Villaraigosa reaffirms his strong commitment to the freedom to marry

The Los Angeles mayor presided over the marriage of Bruce Cohen and Gabriel Catone, in what was supposed to be a simple ceremony at City Hall.

The proceedings were interrupted by a mean-spirited protester introducing herself as “The Angel of the Trinity,” insulting the mayor and warning of myriad natural disasters to be caused by these weddings.

Nothing could ruin this happy day for the newlywed couple who said the interruption "added spice":

"It doesn't spoil our day. It doesn't take away our joy, and it certainly doesn't change the fact that we are legally married in the state of California."

Politicians like Villaraigosa and San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom know they have nothing to fear by so publicly aligning themselves with the LGBT community on this issue. History has shown that Californian politicians who support equality do not end up paying for it at the ballot box.

<a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-marriage24-2008jun24,0,4473689.story">The Los Angeles mayor presided over the marriage of Bruce Cohen and Gabriel Catone</a>, in what was supposed to be a simple ceremony at City Hall. The proceedings were interrupted by a mean-spirited protester introducing herself as “The Angel of the Trinity,” insulting the mayor and warning of myriad natural disasters to be caused by these weddings. Nothing could ruin this happy day for the newlywed couple who said the interruption "added spice": <blockquote>"It doesn't spoil our day. It doesn't take away our joy, and it certainly doesn't change the fact that we are legally married in the state of California."</blockquote> Politicians like Villaraigosa and San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom know they have nothing to fear by so publicly aligning themselves with the LGBT community on this issue. History has shown that Californian politicians who support equality do not end up paying for it at the ballot box.

Monday, June 23, 2008

Monday marriage round-up

:: EQCA’s Wedding Registry is attracting attention, with more and more couples opting out of traditional wedding gifts in favor of donations to help fight the ballot initiative. Read.

:: Marriage spike continues through the weekend. Check out this interactive map.

:: Villaraigosa is delivering on his promise to officiate at same-gender nuptials this summer. Los Angeles’ mayor will perform the rites at the wedding of American Beauty producer Bruce Cohen.

:: EQCA’s <a href="http://www.eqca.org/wedding">Wedding Registry</a> is attracting attention, with more and more couples opting out of traditional wedding gifts in favor of donations to help fight the ballot initiative. <a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_9657096?nclick_check=1">Read.</a> :: <a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hZmLBrL36NObNyMR0ghXN7vB5hYwD91ETQRG2">Marriage spike</a> continues through the weekend. Check out this <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-marriagesmap,0,6124834.htmlstory">interactive map</a>. :: Villaraigosa is delivering on his promise to officiate at same-gender nuptials this summer. <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-marry23-2008jun23,0,5925744.story">Los Angeles’ mayor will perform the rites</a> at the wedding of American Beauty producer Bruce Cohen.

Friday, June 20, 2008

Department of Justice becomes more LGBT-inclusive

There’s still a long way to go, but some tenuous signs of hope have appared.

First of all, it has quietly (so far) approved rights and protections for the children of same-gender couples. The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) prevents federal agencies from recognizing the rights of these couples, but it does not apparently apply to their kids. Score one!

DOMA itself may be on its last legs depending on the results of the next national election…

Second of all, the Department of Justice has reinstated its Pride event for employees after a five year ban. U.S. Attorney General Michael Mukasey is seen by some as more moderate than his controversial predecessors, John Ashcroft and Alberto Gonzales, and revised the department’s nondiscrimination policy in January.

Though Mukasey didn’t once mention the word “gay” or “LGBT,” he declared the theme “Pride is for everyone.” This small step is a welcome one, and long overdue.

There’s still a long way to go, but some tenuous signs of hope have appared. First of all, it has quietly (so far) approved <a href="http://www.advocate.com/news_detail_ektid56172.asp">rights and protections for the children of same-gender couples</a>. The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) prevents federal agencies from recognizing the rights of these couples, but it does not apparently apply to their kids. Score one! DOMA itself may be on its last legs depending on the results of the next national election… Second of all, the Department of Justice has <a href="http://www.washblade.com/thelatest/thelatest.cfm?blog_id=19114">reinstated its Pride event</a> for employees after a five year ban. U.S. Attorney General Michael Mukasey is seen by some as more moderate than his controversial predecessors, John Ashcroft and Alberto Gonzales, and revised the department’s nondiscrimination policy in January. Though Mukasey didn’t once mention the word “gay” or “LGBT,” he declared the theme “Pride is for everyone.” This small step is a welcome one, and long overdue.

Lesbian and gay protections safe in Maine

An anti-LGBT group has given up its campaign to repeal Maine’s nondiscrimination law, after failing in all its goals.

We assume it’s because the voters are Maine-ly fair-minded.

Sacramento anti-LGBT hate-crime trial declared a mistrial

The jury is deadlocked on whether one of the men involved in the tragic death of Satendar Singh is responsible for a hate crime. (SacBee)

Aleksandr Shevchenko was not the man who dealt the fatal blow, but he was at the scene of the crime, shouting homophobic and racial epithets at the victim, and threw a bottle at the victim and his friends.

He is being charged for a misdemeanor and assault, but the jury cannot agree over how much to blame he is for the murder and whether his actions were motivated by hate.

Shevchenko deserves a fair trial, but let’s hope justice is eventually served.

This incident is seen by many as indicative of a wider feud in Sacramento between evangelicals of Slavic descent and the LGBT community, with many from the former group turning out to protest Tuesday’s marriages. Hopefully this trial won’t widen this rift.

The jury is deadlocked on whether one of the men involved in the tragic death of Satendar Singh is responsible for a hate crime. (<a href="http://www.sacbee.com/101/story/1024340.html">SacBee</a>) Aleksandr Shevchenko was not the man who dealt the fatal blow, but he was at the scene of the crime, shouting homophobic and racial epithets at the victim, and threw a bottle at the victim and his friends. He is being charged for a misdemeanor and assault, but the jury cannot agree over how much to blame he is for the murder and whether his actions were motivated by hate. Shevchenko deserves a fair trial, but let’s hope justice is eventually served. This incident is seen by many as indicative of a wider feud in Sacramento between evangelicals of Slavic descent and the LGBT community, with many from the former group turning out to protest Tuesday’s marriages. Hopefully this trial won’t widen this rift.

Bloggers around the world face arrest at record levels

We think The California Ripple Effect is safe for the time being. But some of the arrests were in the United States.

Be careful out there, but never be afraid to speak the truth.

Read more.

Thursday, June 19, 2008

Divorce dead for now in Rhode Island

It’s hard to be too sad about this one.

Still, fair is fair, and the reality is that some marriages, no matter how well they start, must come to an end. When lesbian and gay married couples go to Rhode Island, they face legal uncertainty, whether they’re trying to obtain a marriage, get their existing marriage recognized, or pursuing a divorce.

The freedom to marry could help NJ, too

The freedom to marry could help NJ, too
New Jersey is missing out!
UCLA’s Williams Institute is at it again. After predicting windfall profits for California, it has released yet another study showing the economic boon that could come NJ’s way if it legalized marriage, and the revenue it is losing to California by denying marriage to same-gender couples.

In fact, New Jersey has “all the costs without getting the main benefit." Read.

Bright prospects for Harvey Milk Day 2009

A bill that would officially make May 22 Harvey Milk Day has passed two key senate committees and is awaiting a vote on the Senate floor. If it passes, and the governor signs it, California would be the first state in the nation to have an official holiday commemorating an LGBT leader.

(That is, unless you believe what they say about some US presidents…)

Our fingers are crossed. This could be one historic summer.

Wednesday, June 18, 2008

Mid-week marriage round-up

There were some great stories over the past couple of days, with couples and their love taking center stage.

:: The New York Times covers this “sense of calm.”

:: “an air of ebullient celebration.”

:: “Hope and hoopla.”

:: “A jitter to his voice and a tremor to his hand.”

:: Column: “I once would have opposed gay marriage.” Marcos Bretón explains why times have changed.

:: “Without a hitch.”

:: “Snapshots” and “Vignettes.”

:: “Dreams come true.”

:: “Ground Zero.”

:: California’s new “Summer of Love”.

:: Phyllis and Del, at it again. The iconic lesbian couple of 55 years were the first to be married in San Francisco by Mayor Gavin Newsom.

:: LA Times editorial defends the “right to love.”

:: Wedding Bells in Bakersfield.

:: Tying the knot at last in Orange County.

:: Reactions around the world to the California weddings.

:: Silent—for now. Many people noted the remarkable lack of protestors at the marriage ceremonies. Don’t be fooled. This does not mean there are no opponents of marriage out there. They have a plan.

:: With all the fanfare of yesterday’s celebrations, one significant story may have been drowned out. A Sacramento judge and the state Appeals Court both refused to halt the marriages, in response to a bizarre and poorly defended request by anti-marriage groups, based on shoddy legal claims.

There were some great stories over the past couple of days, with couples and their love taking center stage. :: The New York Times covers this “<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/18/us/18weddings.html?_r=2&ref=us&oref=slogin&oref=slogin">sense of calm</a>.” :: “an air of <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/06/18/MNPA11ANT1.DTL">ebullient celebration</a>.” :: “<a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-marriage18-2008jun18,0,6701919.story">Hope and hoopla</a>.” :: “<a href="http://www.sacbee.com/101/story/1021722.html">A jitter to his voice and a tremor to his hand.</a>” :: Column: “<a href="http://sacbee.com/breton/story/1021354.html">I once would have opposed gay marriage.</a>” Marcos Bretón explains why times have changed. :: “<a href="http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/metro/20080617-2105-bn17wedding4.html">Without a hitch</a>.” :: “<a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/news/ci_9615047">Snapshots</a>” and “<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Gay-Marriage-Vignettes.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=vignettes&st=nyt&oref=slogin">Vignettes.</a>” :: “<a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2008-06-17-gay_N.htm?loc=interstitialskip">Dreams come true</a>.” :: “<a href="http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1815272,00.html">Ground Zero.</a>” :: California’s new “<a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hZmLBrL36NObNyMR0ghXN7vB5hYwD91C4V800">Summer of Love</a>”. :: <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/06/17/MN8C11ACCD.DTL&tsp=1">Phyllis and Del</a>, at it again. The iconic lesbian couple of 55 years were the first to be married in San Francisco by Mayor Gavin Newsom. :: LA Times editorial defends the “<a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/editorials/la-ed-marriage17-2008jun17,0,6760724.story">right to love.</a>” :: Wedding Bells in <a href="http://www.bakersfield.com/hourly_news/story/474175.html">Bakersfield.</a> :: Tying the knot at last in <a href="http://www.ocregister.com/articles/couples-sex-courthouse-2070190-marriage-married">Orange County.</a> :: <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-worldwed17-2008jun17,0,3467680.story">Reactions around the world</a> to the California weddings. :: <a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-opponents18-2008jun18,0,3026225.story?page=1">Silent—for now.</a> Many people noted the remarkable lack of protestors at the marriage ceremonies. Don’t be fooled. This does not mean there are no opponents of marriage out there. They have a plan. :: With all the fanfare of yesterday’s celebrations, one significant story may have been drowned out. A Sacramento judge and the state Appeals Court both <a href="http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/state/20080617-1553-ca-gaymarriage-appeal.html">refused to halt the marriages</a>, in response to a bizarre and poorly defended request by anti-marriage groups, based on shoddy legal claims.

A personal perspective.

Even though I’m single, the last few weeks of my life have been dominated by marriage. I’m sure I’m not alone. So it surprised me how off-guard I was caught today watching all the couples finally share this important milestone. I was actually tearing up!

But what really made my day was George Takei. Through the jerking cameras and erratic flashing, I glimpsed the actor who played Mr. Sulu on Star Trek pick up a marriage license with his fiancé, Brad Altman.

See, my parents met watching Star Trek. Boy-meets-girl in the student lounge, and decides that this girl absolutely needs to understand through and through the plot of this Sci-Fi cult favorite, and proceeds to explain it to her, in detail. In truth, she probably wasn’t very interested in the show itself, but something about this earnest young man kept her listening.

My parents’ long marriage had its origins in Star Trek, and on this day, I’m glad that Mr. Sulu is here to mark the beginnings of my marriage, too—my eventual marriage.

--George Simpson is the primary blogger for The California Ripple Effect.

<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_0b9Ihzs8eZM/SFlJPMGN-LI/AAAAAAAAASM/Gr85Rn3ARng/s1600-h/189.JPG"><img style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_0b9Ihzs8eZM/SFlJPMGN-LI/AAAAAAAAASM/Gr85Rn3ARng/s320/189.JPG" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5213278568952232114" border="0" /></a> Even though I’m single, the last few weeks of my life have been dominated by marriage. I’m sure I’m not alone. So it surprised me how off-guard I was caught today watching all the couples finally share this important milestone. I was actually tearing up! But what really made my day was George Takei. Through the jerking cameras and erratic flashing, I glimpsed the actor who played Mr. Sulu on Star Trek pick up a marriage license with his fiancé, Brad Altman. See, my parents met watching Star Trek. Boy-meets-girl in the student lounge, and decides that this girl absolutely needs to understand through and through the plot of this Sci-Fi cult favorite, and proceeds to explain it to her, in detail. In truth, she probably wasn’t very interested in the show itself, but something about this earnest young man kept her listening. My parents’ long marriage had its origins in Star Trek, and on this day, I’m glad that Mr. Sulu is here to mark the beginnings of my marriage, too—my eventual marriage. <a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_0b9Ihzs8eZM/SFlI82XhT4I/AAAAAAAAASE/wCDGrf5g7aY/s1600-h/GEORGE+SIMPSON+PHOTO.JPG"><img style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_0b9Ihzs8eZM/SFlI82XhT4I/AAAAAAAAASE/wCDGrf5g7aY/s200/GEORGE+SIMPSON+PHOTO.JPG" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5213278253881577346" border="0" /></a> --George Simpson is the primary blogger for The California Ripple Effect.

Couples Wed in California: Day 2

The view from WeHo.

EQCA President and former Mayor of West Hollywood warms up the crowd.

Couples signing in.

Lining up to get their licenses.

The paperwork.

WeHo’s first wedding is mobbed by the media.

As is this one.

Likewise, George Takei’s appearance with his longtime partner, Brad, caused quite the stir. “Live long and prosper.”

A little music along the way.

The view from WeHo. <a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_0b9Ihzs8eZM/SFk8qqLnFAI/AAAAAAAAAQE/C99sH9xzy94/s1600-h/092.JPG"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_0b9Ihzs8eZM/SFk8qqLnFAI/AAAAAAAAAQE/C99sH9xzy94/s400/092.JPG" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5213264747233219586" border="0" /></a> EQCA President and former Mayor of West Hollywood warms up the crowd. <a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_0b9Ihzs8eZM/SFk9NEhQpkI/AAAAAAAAAQM/wwCYy7c6D9w/s1600-h/141.JPG"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_0b9Ihzs8eZM/SFk9NEhQpkI/AAAAAAAAAQM/wwCYy7c6D9w/s400/141.JPG" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5213265338418898498" border="0" /></a> Couples signing in. <a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_0b9Ihzs8eZM/SFk-X1ceQqI/AAAAAAAAAQc/YucQtDeyX3g/s1600-h/160.JPG"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_0b9Ihzs8eZM/SFk-X1ceQqI/AAAAAAAAAQc/YucQtDeyX3g/s400/160.JPG" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5213266622862475938" border="0" /></a> Lining up to get their licenses. <a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_0b9Ihzs8eZM/SFk9nYXbNCI/AAAAAAAAAQU/H-52sXRY_LE/s1600-h/143.JPG"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_0b9Ihzs8eZM/SFk9nYXbNCI/AAAAAAAAAQU/H-52sXRY_LE/s400/143.JPG" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5213265790422955042" border="0" /></a> The paperwork. <a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_0b9Ihzs8eZM/SFk_tVCf99I/AAAAAAAAARM/2xax_nGGAJc/s1600-h/204.JPG"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_0b9Ihzs8eZM/SFk_tVCf99I/AAAAAAAAARM/2xax_nGGAJc/s400/204.JPG" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5213268091632351186" border="0" /></a> WeHo’s first wedding is mobbed by the media. <a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_0b9Ihzs8eZM/SFk_ZjHzRrI/AAAAAAAAAQ8/fO_gyGwyOcY/s1600-h/266.JPG"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_0b9Ihzs8eZM/SFk_ZjHzRrI/AAAAAAAAAQ8/fO_gyGwyOcY/s400/266.JPG" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5213267751815300786" border="0" /></a> As is this one. <a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_0b9Ihzs8eZM/SFlDYzswY6I/AAAAAAAAARc/6nzJ9_pArlM/s1600-h/148.JPG"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_0b9Ihzs8eZM/SFlDYzswY6I/AAAAAAAAARc/6nzJ9_pArlM/s400/148.JPG" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5213272137131910050" border="0" /></a> Likewise, George Takei’s appearance with his longtime partner, Brad, caused quite the stir. “Live long and prosper.” <a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_0b9Ihzs8eZM/SFk-h7-LpcI/AAAAAAAAAQk/i9mCzO-kzYo/s1600-h/208.JPG"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_0b9Ihzs8eZM/SFk-h7-LpcI/AAAAAAAAAQk/i9mCzO-kzYo/s400/208.JPG" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5213266796413167042" border="0" /></a> A little music along the way.

Monday, June 16, 2008

Congratulations to all the newlyweds!

Friday, June 13, 2008

Friday marriage round-up

It’s Friday the 13th, not an auspicious day for a wedding, if you’re so inclined. Here’s what’s going on.

:: Loving Day. Wednesday was the 41st anniversary of the historic victory for the freedom to marry, Loving vs. Virginia, in which all laws banning interracial marriage in the United States were struck down by the Supreme Court. Mildred Loving recently passed away, but her and her husband’s memory lives on in the struggle for equality.

:: Judge Wed. California Supreme Court Justice who helped secure the freedom to marry, will officiate weddings for same-gender couples.

“When it became clear… that same-sex marriage would soon become legal, Michael Nava, staff attorney for Justice Carlos Moreno, posed a question to his boss. Would Moreno, one of the four justices who voted to strike down the state's same-sex marriage ban, perform the wedding ceremony for Nava and his partner of six years? Moreno immediately agreed.” (Daily Journal)

Moreno expressed some concern at being so directly involved, since it could affect his impartiality later if voters approve a marriage ban and the court has to decide whether to nullify same-gender marriages performed prior to the election. The court’s historic decision came out of a delicate balance, and if Moreno has to recuse himself, it could be drastically altered. Moreno said he’d deal with the consequences later.

:: Fred Phelps and friends from the infamous Westboro Baptist Church have announced plans to picket the weddings of lesbians and gays in California. Nothing like ruining a stranger’s wedding to uphold the sanctity of marriage, huh? As vile as this crew are, they may just hurt their own cause, more than they help it. What exactly is their cause again?

:: The former marriage capitol of the world, Las Vegas, wishes it could get in on the action. Read gay duh.

:: Be sure to make marriage decisions wisely, because divorce can be very tricky for couples who leave California.

:: Residents of the windy city may be able to keep some benefits, if they get married in California. Read.

:: The daughter of Massachusetts Governor Deval Patick, a key player in the struggle for the freedom to marry in his state, has come out. Congrats! Read.

:: Speaking of fabulous governors, a majority of New Yorkers support Paterson’s decision to recognize same-gender marriages from out of state.

:: LA Times answers all your questions about marriage.

:: The freedom to marry may play a role in the voting decisions of some Republicans and evangelicals, but support is growing overall. (Pew.)

:: Paradise Lost. Marriage ban proposed in the Cayman Islands.

:: Anti-LGBT groups file frivolous and hopeless lawsuit, trying once more to delay the Supreme Court’s decision. This time it’s with the Court of Appeals, which is supposed to be subordinate to the Supreme, and therefore is bound by its previous refusal, and so… What do they think they’re doing?

:: Kern County Clerk Ann Barnett continues to take heat for her politically motivated decision to discontinue performing all weddings. Kern County is joined by Butte County in unholy non-matrimony. Merced County had a fling with them for a while, but quickly reversed its decision and left the polygamous relationship.

Barnett cited staff and budgetary constraints for her unilateral decision, though only 26 couples had signed up for the first day, numbers are expected to taper off after that, and the Kern County supervisor has offered extra staff and budget for the occasion. Her office is still required to hand our licenses, though, and many volunteers are planning to officiate weddings for free outside on the 17th, perhaps including Mayor Gavin Newsom. Barnett is represented by one of the legal organizations trying to reverse the Supreme Court’s decision.

She recently granted the LA Times an interview.

:: “Make change, not lawsuits.” An ample group of pro-marriage organizations has urged restraint to couples who come marry in California. Be very cautious about suing in your home state. If the movement isn’t strategic, it could suffer hard-to-reverse legal defeats. We must lay the groundwork, first. Coordination is key.

It’s Friday the 13th, not an auspicious day for a wedding, if you’re so inclined. Here’s what’s going on. :: <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/visibleman/">Loving Day.</a> Wednesday was the 41st anniversary of the historic victory for the freedom to marry, Loving vs. Virginia, in which all laws banning interracial marriage in the United States were struck down by the Supreme Court. <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/05/05/mildred-loving-matriarch-_n_100255.html">Mildred Loving recently passed away</a>, but her and her husband’s memory lives on in the struggle for equality. :: <a href="file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/george/Local%20Settings/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/OLKEE/ATT1364095.htm">Judge Wed.</a> California Supreme Court Justice who helped secure the freedom to marry, will officiate weddings for same-gender couples. <blockquote>“When it became clear… that same-sex marriage would soon become legal, Michael Nava, staff attorney for Justice Carlos Moreno, posed a question to his boss. Would Moreno, one of the four justices who voted to strike down the state's same-sex marriage ban, perform the wedding ceremony for Nava and his partner of six years? Moreno immediately agreed.” (<a href="http://www.dailyjournal.com/">Daily Journal</a>)</blockquote> Moreno expressed some concern at being so directly involved, since it could affect his impartiality later if voters approve a marriage ban and the court has to decide whether to nullify same-gender marriages performed prior to the election. The court’s historic decision came out of a delicate balance, and if Moreno has to recuse himself, it could be drastically altered. Moreno said he’d deal with the consequences later. <a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_0b9Ihzs8eZM/SFK6C9BzB1I/AAAAAAAAAPk/td9FCngdwcI/s1600-h/tgf911-small.gif"><img style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_0b9Ihzs8eZM/SFK6C9BzB1I/AAAAAAAAAPk/td9FCngdwcI/s400/tgf911-small.gif" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5211432278725691218" border="0" /></a>:: Fred Phelps and friends from the infamous Westboro Baptist Church have announced <a href="http://www.godhatesfags.com/">plans to picket the weddings of lesbians and gays</a> in California. Nothing like ruining a stranger’s wedding to uphold the sanctity of marriage, huh? As vile as this crew are, they may just hurt their own cause, more than they help it. What exactly is their cause again? :: The former marriage capitol of the world, Las Vegas, wishes it could get in on the action. <a href="http://www.lasvegasweekly.com/news/2008/jun/12/nevadas-gay-duh/">Read gay duh. </a> :: Be sure to make marriage decisions wisely, because <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2008-04-15-gay-divorces_n.htm">divorce can be very tricky</a> for couples who leave California. :: Residents of the windy city may be able to keep some benefits, if they get married in California. <a href="http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/1003924,CST-NWS-gay13.article">Read.</a> :: The daughter of Massachusetts Governor Deval Patick, a key player in the struggle for the freedom to marry in his state, has come out. Congrats! <a href="http://news.bostonherald.com/news/opinion/columnists/view/2008_06_13_Straight_talk_proves_war_is_won_in_Mass_/srvc=home&position=also">Read.</a> :: Speaking of fabulous governors, a <a href="http://www.weny.com/News-Regional.asp?ARTICLE3890=8139608">majority of New Yorkers support Paterson’s decision</a> to recognize same-gender marriages from out of state. :: <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-marriageqa13-2008jun13,0,4198957.story">LA Times</a> answers all your questions about marriage. :: The freedom to marry may play a role in the voting decisions of some Republicans and evangelicals, but support is growing overall. (<a href="http://pewresearch.org/pubs/868/gay-marriage">Pew.</a>) :: <a href="http://www.caycompass.com/cgi-bin/CFPnews.cgi?ID=1031387">Paradise Lost.</a> Marriage ban proposed in the Cayman Islands. :: Anti-LGBT groups file <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-gaymarriage13-2008jun13,0,5920173.story">frivolous and hopeless lawsuit</a>, trying once more to delay the Supreme Court’s decision. This time it’s with the Court of Appeals, which is supposed to be subordinate to the Supreme, and therefore is bound by its previous refusal, and so… What do they think they’re doing? :: Kern County Clerk Ann Barnett <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/13/us/13marriage.html?sq=gay&st=nyt&adxnnl=1&scp=5&adxnnlx=1213352015-DUyOABQtCF9ShbZKZbInJQ">continues to take heat</a> for her politically motivated decision to discontinue performing all weddings. Kern County is joined by Butte County in unholy non-matrimony. Merced County had a fling with them for a while, but quickly reversed its decision and left the polygamous relationship. Barnett cited staff and budgetary constraints for her unilateral decision, though only 26 couples had signed up for the first day, numbers are expected to taper off after that, and the Kern County supervisor has offered extra staff and budget for the occasion. Her office is still required to hand our licenses, though, and many volunteers are planning to officiate weddings for free outside on the 17th, <a href="http://www.goodasyou.org/good_as_you/2008/06/i-am-gavin-here.html">perhaps including Mayor Gavin Newsom</a>. Barnett is represented by one of the legal organizations trying to reverse the Supreme Court’s decision. She recently granted the LA Times an <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-kern13-2008jun13,0,3399678.story?page=1">interview</a>. :: “Make change, not lawsuits.” An ample group of pro-marriage organizations has<a href="http://www.freedomtomarry.org/pdfs/ca_joint_advisory.pdf"> urged restraint to couples who come marry in California</a>. Be very cautious about suing in your home state. If the movement isn’t strategic, it could suffer hard-to-reverse legal defeats. We must lay the groundwork, first. Coordination is key.

Thursday, June 12, 2008

Obama reaches out to LGBT Community

It’s been quite the gay week for Barack Obama. He has reached out to Senator Clinton’s LGBT supporters, appointed David Noble (former Task Force Public Policy and Government Affairs Director) to his staff, and sat down for an interview with the Advocate.

This is significant because Obama, perhaps unfairly, has taken some heat in the past for supposedly ignoring the LGBT press, most notably when the Philadelphia Gay News printed a blank front-page “interview” with the candidate. Apparently it doesn’t matter that the journalist responsible was a financial supporter of rival Clinton.

For his part Obama points out that,

“I haven’t been silent on gay issues. What’s happened is, I speak oftentimes to gay issues to a public general audience. When I spoke at Ebenezer Church for King Day, I talked about the need to get over the homophobia in the African-American community; when I deliver my stump speeches routinely I talk about the way that antigay sentiment is used to divide the country and distract us from issues that we need to be working on, and I include gay constituencies as people that should be treated with full honor and respect as part of the American family.

“So I actually have been much more vocal on gay issues to general audiences than any other presidential candidate probably in history. What I probably haven’t done as much as the press would like is to put out as many specialized interviews." Read the whole interview.

:: Visit Barack Obama’s Pride Site.

<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_0b9Ihzs8eZM/SFGSmo1cbNI/AAAAAAAAAPc/Qq-cJKSipdc/s1600-h/lgbt_logo.gif"><img style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_0b9Ihzs8eZM/SFGSmo1cbNI/AAAAAAAAAPc/Qq-cJKSipdc/s200/lgbt_logo.gif" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5211107436338638034" border="0" /></a> It’s been quite the gay week for Barack Obama. He has <a href="http://www.innewsweekly.com/innews/?class_code=Ne&article_code=5569">reached out to Senator Clinton’s LGBT supporters</a>, <a href="http://www.queerty.com/obama-ramps-up-gay-efforts-with-new-initiative-20080611/">appointed David Noble</a> (former Task Force Public Policy and Government Affairs Director) to his staff, and sat down for an <a href="http://www.advocate.com/print_article_ektid53285.asp">interview with the Advocate</a>. This is significant because Obama, perhaps unfairly, has taken some heat in the past for supposedly <a href="http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=35323ECC-3048-5C12-00310488BACEEB14">ignoring the LGBT press</a>, most notably when the Philadelphia Gay News printed a blank front-page “interview” with the candidate. Apparently it doesn’t matter that the <a href="http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=35323ECC-3048-5C12-00310488BACEEB14">journalist responsible was a financial supporter of rival Clinton</a>. For his part Obama points out that, <blockquote>“I haven’t been silent on gay issues. What’s happened is, I speak oftentimes to gay issues to a public general audience. When I spoke at Ebenezer Church for King Day, I talked about the need to get over the homophobia in the African-American community; when I deliver my stump speeches routinely I talk about the way that antigay sentiment is used to divide the country and distract us from issues that we need to be working on, and I include gay constituencies as people that should be treated with full honor and respect as part of the American family. “So I actually have been much more vocal on gay issues to general audiences than any other presidential candidate probably in history. What I probably haven’t done as much as the press would like is to put out as many specialized interviews." <a href="http://www.advocate.com/print_article_ektid53285.asp">Read the whole interview.</a></blockquote><a href="http://www.advocate.com/print_article_ektid53285.asp"></a> :: <a href="http://pride.barackobama.com/">Visit Barack Obama’s Pride Site</a>.

Thank Tila Tequila for the Freedom to Marry

We now have the answer! Ms. Tequila is responsible.

"It is because of me — I definitely think [my show] has helped the movement…

"Before it came out, everyone was still a little apprehensive about [same sex relationships… Then they realized, 'Wow, everyone is really into this stuff, and it is fine.' The next thing you know, [gay marriage] is legal." Read.

It’s a relief to know we all have Tila Tequila to thank for being able to realize our hopes and dreams. Thank you, and bless you.

<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_0b9Ihzs8eZM/SFGPNoh2wOI/AAAAAAAAAPU/CyR-UCCeEak/s1600-h/l_a6813cc4074dc221efabd40489041dfc.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_0b9Ihzs8eZM/SFGPNoh2wOI/AAAAAAAAAPU/CyR-UCCeEak/s200/l_a6813cc4074dc221efabd40489041dfc.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5211103708224864482" border="0" /></a> We now have the answer! Ms. Tequila is responsible. <blockquote>"It is because of me — I definitely think [my show] has helped the movement… "Before it came out, everyone was still a little apprehensive about [same sex relationships… Then they realized, 'Wow, everyone is really into this stuff, and it is fine.' The next thing you know, [gay marriage] is legal." <a href="http://www.usmagazine.com/tila-tequila-gays-can-get-married-because-of-me">Read.</a></blockquote><a href="http://www.usmagazine.com/tila-tequila-gays-can-get-married-because-of-me"></a> It’s a relief to know we all have Tila Tequila to thank for being able to realize our hopes and dreams. Thank you, and bless you.

Gold Rush!

Everyone’s talking about Tuesday. Or possibly Monday. Or maybe even never?

What’s clear is there’s going to be a huge rush! Or more of a trickle?

It’s gonna be a busy week just thinking about what might happen.

Everyone’s talking about <a href="http://www.knbc.com/family/16578406/detail.html">Tuesday</a>. Or possibly Monday. Or maybe even <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-morrison12-2008jun12,0,4911853.column">never</a>? What’s clear is there’s going to be a <a href="http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1813699,00.html">huge rush</a>! Or more of a <a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/valley/ci_9560794?nclick_check=1">trickle</a>? It’s gonna be a <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-marriages12-2008jun12,0,7514825.story">busy week</a> just thinking about what might happen.

The freedom to marry comes to Norway

Congratulations, Norway! Welcome to the club.

Norway has become the sixth country to allow same-gender couples to marry. This is a vast improvement from their 1993 law allowing domestic partnerships, but not allowing lesbians and gays to be married in churches or to raise families.

The parliament approved the measure by a vote of 84 to 41, with a coalition of several parties. It will go into effect by the end of the year, or at the beginning of next year.

Congratulations, Norway! Welcome to the club. <a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_0b9Ihzs8eZM/SFFtP1hMfVI/AAAAAAAAAO0/aC8KJ8AzWZ4/s1600-h/1963107-Norwegian_Flag-Oslo.gif"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_0b9Ihzs8eZM/SFFtP1hMfVI/AAAAAAAAAO0/aC8KJ8AzWZ4/s400/1963107-Norwegian_Flag-Oslo.gif" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5211066362676149586" border="0" /></a> <a href="http://www.advocate.com/news_detail_ektid55738.asp">Norway has become the sixth country to allow same-gender couples to marry.</a> This is a vast improvement from their 1993 law allowing domestic partnerships, but not allowing lesbians and gays to be married in churches or to raise families. The parliament approved the measure by <a href="http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5jko_BIHizUFFqUtmEaUrAEoPXFWw">a vote of 84 to 41</a>, with a coalition of several parties. It will go into effect by the end of the year, or at the beginning of next year.

What straights can learn from lesbian and gay couples

More and more research into the relationships of long-term same-gender couples is showing that they may actually have something to teach married opposite-gender couples.

Studies demonstrate that same-gender relationships tend to be more egalitarian, with more effective conflict resolution. A possible reason for this is that it’s harder for these couples to fall into stereotypical gender roles.

Berkeley’s Robert Levenson has found that,

“When they got into these really negative interactions, gay and lesbian couples were able to do things like use humor and affection that enabled them to step back from the ledge and continue to talk about the problem instead of just exploding.” (NYT)

He also expressed hope that certain negative behaviors thought to be reserved for one gender or another, may actually be more fluid, and therefore fixable.

More and more research into the relationships of long-term same-gender couples is showing that they may actually have something to teach married opposite-gender couples. Studies demonstrate that same-gender relationships tend to be more egalitarian, with more effective conflict resolution. A possible reason for this is that it’s harder for these couples to fall into stereotypical gender roles. Berkeley’s Robert Levenson has found that, <blockquote>“When they got into these really negative interactions, gay and lesbian couples were able to do things like use humor and affection that enabled them to step back from the ledge and continue to talk about the problem instead of just exploding.” (<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/10/health/10well.html?_r=1&sq=gay&st=nyt&scp=3&pagewanted=print&oref=slogin">NYT</a>)</blockquote> He also expressed hope that certain negative behaviors thought to be reserved for one gender or another, may actually be more fluid, and therefore fixable.

Monday, June 9, 2008

Monday marriage round-up

:: “Battling for America’s Soul.” We were thrilled by the Macy’s ad in the LA Times celebrating the newly found freedom to marry. We were not thrilled when the LA Times also ran a two-page ad from an anti-LGBT group decrying the freedom to marry and claiming that it “threatens our nation and faith.”

:: The marriage ban may not be what it seems. Or at least, it could have unintended consequences. This Washington Post article explores some of the legal conundrums that could be created if voters approve the ban, and highlights some unexpected—though possible—outcomes.

:: Kern County to cancel all weddings. County Clerk Ann Barnett cited a lack of staff and resources, but she only made her decision after being told she could not refuse to marry same-gender couples, and has been receiving advice from the anti-marriage Alliance Defense Fund.

Anti-marriage protestors are planning to bombard a Board of Supervisors meeting tomorrow. They could get lonely out there if there aren’t any supporters of the freedom to marry sharing their voice, too. If you live in Kern County, check it out.

:: “<a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/readers/2008/06/battling-for-am.html">Battling for America’s Soul</a>.” We were thrilled by the Macy’s ad in the LA Times celebrating the newly found freedom to marry. We were not thrilled when the LA Times also ran a two-page ad from an anti-LGBT group decrying the freedom to marry and claiming that it “threatens our nation and faith.” :: The marriage ban may not be what it seems. Or at least, it could have unintended consequences. This <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/07/AR2008060701531.html?hpid=moreheadlines">Washington Post</a> article explores some of the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/07/AR2008060701531.html?hpid=moreheadlines">legal conundrums</a> that could be created if voters approve the ban, and highlights some unexpected—though possible—outcomes. :: <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/06/AR2008060602760.html">Kern County to cancel all weddings.</a> County Clerk Ann Barnett cited a lack of staff and resources, but she only made her decision after being told she could not refuse to marry same-gender couples, and has been receiving advice from the anti-marriage Alliance Defense Fund. Anti-marriage <a href="http://www.turnto23.com/news/16548433/detail.html">protestors are planning to bombard a Board of Supervisors meeting tomorrow</a>. They could get lonely out there if there aren’t any supporters of the freedom to marry sharing their voice, too. If you live in Kern County, check it out.

Los Angeles Pride 2008

Happy Pride!

It is with renewed spirit that LGBT communities are showing their Pride this year, in events all across the state. This summer they are both celebrating an historic victory, and gearing up for an arduous campaign to hold onto that victory.

Equality for All was out in full force at the West Hollywood festivities, recruiting volunteers, raising crucial funds, and asking everyone in sight to “vow to vote no” on the marriage ban in November.

About 100 volunteers braved the crowds and heat this weekend, doing this important work. There are many more Prides this summer, and the EQCA Marriage PAC could sure use some help. Consider donating some time now, because after November, time will be out.

The EQCA Marriage PAC also raised money (and consciousness) with the Pride event “Reality Checked” at Here Bar on Friday, where guests got to meet and mingle with several reality TV personalities. Very Hollywood.

Be proud.

<div>Happy Pride! </div><div></div> <div>It is with renewed spirit that LGBT communities are showing their Pride this year, in events all across the state. This summer they are both celebrating an historic victory, and gearing up for an arduous campaign to hold onto that victory.</div><div> Equality for All was out in full force at the West Hollywood festivities, recruiting volunteers, raising crucial funds, and asking everyone in sight to “vow to vote no” on the marriage ban in November. About 100 volunteers braved the crowds and heat this weekend, doing this important work. There are many more Prides this summer, and the <a href="http://www.eqca.org/marriage/volunteer">EQCA Marriage PAC could sure use some help</a>. Consider donating some time now, because after November, time will be out. </div><div> The EQCA Marriage PAC also raised money (and consciousness) with the Pride event “Reality Checked” at Here Bar on Friday, where guests got to meet and mingle with several reality TV personalities. Very Hollywood. Be proud. </div><div> </div><div></div>

Friday, June 6, 2008

Friday marriage round-up

:: They’ve pushed up the date. Same-gender couples may be able to get married as early as 5 p.m. June 16, in some jurisdictions. In San Francisco, Mayor Newsom wants to start granting marriages the minute the decision goes into effect, with extended hours from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. until demand subsides. They are expecting to officiate over 500 ceremonies every day!

With those numbers, it may be best to reserve a spot ahead of time.

But don’t count on marrying that early, because many counties are sticking to the June 17 date.

:: Why does it take a staggering 67% majority to pass an initiative investing in infrastructure, but a mere 51% majority to change the constitution in order to single-out a minority and treat them unfairly? Neal Broverman’s LA Times Op-Ed explores this discrepancy.

:: Greece has its own “marriage mayor.” In a Gavin Newsom-esque move, the mayor of a small Greek island has performed two historic marriages, one between two women, and the other between two men.

:: Andrew Sullivan contends that marriage is becoming a non-issue. “Which means: we win.”

Well, whatever happens, marriage will continue to be a rather big issue for the two people involved!

:: They’ve pushed up the date. <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/06/06/BAS8114AVJ.DTL">Same-gender couples may be able to get married as early as 5 p.m. June 16</a>, in some jurisdictions. In San Francisco, Mayor Newsom wants to start granting marriages the minute the decision goes into effect, with extended hours from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. until demand subsides. They are expecting to officiate over 500 ceremonies every day! With those numbers, it may be best to <a href="http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/metro/20080606-9999-1m6clerk.html">reserve a spot ahead of time</a>. But don’t count on marrying that early, because <a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_9499246?source=rss">many counties are sticking to the June 17 date</a>. :: Why does it take a staggering 67% majority to pass an initiative investing in infrastructure, but a mere 51% majority to change the constitution in order to single-out a minority and treat them unfairly? <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-broverman6-2008jun06,0,4046123.story">Neal Broverman’s LA Times Op-Ed</a> explores this discrepancy. :: Greece has its own “marriage mayor.” In a Gavin Newsom-esque move, the <a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/06/03/europe/greece.php">mayor of a small Greek island has performed two historic marriages</a>, one between two women, and the other between two men. :: <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/06/californias-mom.html">Andrew Sullivan</a> contends that <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/06/californias-mom.html">marriage is becoming a non-issue</a>. “Which means: we win.” Well, whatever happens, marriage will continue to be a rather big issue for the two people involved!

Thursday, June 5, 2008

Baldwin and Frank establish LGBT Equality Caucus in US Congress

Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin and Barney Frank of Massachusetts announced the formation of a 52-member group, including two Republicans, in order to

“achieve the extension of equal rights, the repeal of discriminatory laws, the elimination of hate-motivated violence, and the improved health and well being for all, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity or expression.” Read.

The new Caucus is a more formal version of a previously existing ad-hoc committee designed to advocate for LGBT issues, and represents a turning point in the struggle to mainstream equality in the halls of Congress, with LGBT advocates moving from defense to offense.

Maybe they were inspired by California’s LGBT Caucus, which scored victories in yesterday’s election.

Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin and Barney Frank of Massachusetts announced the formation of a 52-member group, including two Republicans, in order to <blockquote>“achieve the extension of equal rights, the repeal of discriminatory laws, the elimination of hate-motivated violence, and the improved health and well being for all, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity or expression.” <a href="http://tammybaldwin.house.gov/PRArticle.aspx?NewsID=1474">Read. </a></blockquote>The new Caucus is a more formal version of a previously existing ad-hoc committee designed to advocate for LGBT issues, and represents a turning point in the struggle to mainstream equality in the halls of Congress, with <a href="http://www.planetout.com/news/article.html?2008/06/04/">LGBT advocates moving from defense to offense</a>. Maybe they were inspired by California’s LGBT Caucus, which scored <a href="http://ca-ripple-effect.blogspot.com/2008/06/pro-equality-legislature-emerges-for.html">victories</a> in yesterday’s election.

Wednesday, June 4, 2008

Pro-Equality Legislature Emerges for 2009

Alice Kessler, EQCA’s Government Affairs Director, blogs about yesterday’s election results.

Last night’s June Primary Election yielded good news for LGBT Californians. Because of the way districts are drawn in California, the Primary results have all but assured that come November we’ll continue to have the needed majority in both houses of the Legislature to preserve full equality for the LGBT community, including the freedom to marry.

The future of California’s LGBT Legislative Caucus will also be secure. Senator Christine Kehoe will continue to provide leadership from San Diego. In one of the highest profile Primary races, Assemblymember Mark Leno defeated incumbent Senator Carole Migden (also openly-LGBT) and former Marin County Assemblymember Joe Nation in the 3rd Senate District, and is virtually guaranteed to win in November. Two newcomers from safe Democratic districts, John Perez, a former Community Redevelopment Agency Commissioner from Los Angeles, and San Francisco Supervisor Tom Ammiano, will round out the Caucus.

The bad news? Five openly LGBT candidates lost their Primary races. Legislative candidates who fell short included West Sacramento Mayor Christopher Cabaldon, Cathedral City Councilmember Greg Pettis, former Deputy State Controller Laurette Healey and Berkeley City Councilmember Kriss Worthington. In Alameda County, openly transgender judicial candidate Victoria Kolakowski lost her bid for a Superior Court seat. In a crowded field of highly-qualified opponents, Kolakowski ran an admirable campaign, inspiring transgender people throughout the world to run for public office. These losses remind us that we must continue to work tirelessly to support our own and foster new LGBT political leadership.

Looking toward November, the hottest races will center on three key swing seats. Santa Barbara Senate candidate Hannah Beth Jackson and Assembly candidates Marty Block (San Diego) and Joan Buchanan (Danville) support full equality. All three will face tough General Election contests against opponents who do not. If we win in these key battleground districts, we will pick up even greater support in the Legislature for the LGBT community.

What does it all mean? We can take a collective sigh of relief. Equality will continue to prevail in 2009, and the LGBT Caucus lives on. But our work is far from done as we move into the General and map out a path to success for emerging LGBT leaders beyond this year’s election contests.

<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_0b9Ihzs8eZM/SEbdCcjIZZI/AAAAAAAAANs/nH3j4Lj_gno/s1600-h/ALICE%2520KESSLER.jpg"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5208093053193577874" style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_0b9Ihzs8eZM/SEbdCcjIZZI/AAAAAAAAANs/nH3j4Lj_gno/s200/ALICE%2520KESSLER.jpg" border="0" /></a>Alice Kessler, EQCA’s Government Affairs Director, blogs about yesterday’s election results. Last night’s June Primary Election yielded good news for LGBT Californians. Because of the way districts are drawn in California, the Primary results have all but assured that come November we’ll continue to have the needed majority in both houses of the Legislature to preserve full equality for the LGBT community, including the freedom to marry. The future of California’s LGBT Legislative Caucus will also be secure. Senator Christine Kehoe will continue to provide leadership from San Diego. In one of the highest profile Primary races, Assemblymember Mark Leno defeated incumbent Senator Carole Migden (also openly-LGBT) and former Marin County Assemblymember Joe Nation in the 3rd Senate District, and is virtually guaranteed to win in November. Two newcomers from safe Democratic districts, John Perez, a former Community Redevelopment Agency Commissioner from Los Angeles, and San Francisco Supervisor Tom Ammiano, will round out the Caucus. The bad news? Five openly LGBT candidates lost their Primary races. Legislative candidates who fell short included West Sacramento Mayor Christopher Cabaldon, Cathedral City Councilmember Greg Pettis, former Deputy State Controller Laurette Healey and Berkeley City Councilmember Kriss Worthington. In Alameda County, openly transgender judicial candidate Victoria Kolakowski lost her bid for a Superior Court seat. In a crowded field of highly-qualified opponents, Kolakowski ran an admirable campaign, inspiring transgender people throughout the world to run for public office. These losses remind us that we must continue to work tirelessly to support our own and foster new LGBT political leadership. Looking toward November, the hottest races will center on three key swing seats. Santa Barbara Senate candidate Hannah Beth Jackson and Assembly candidates Marty Block (San Diego) and Joan Buchanan (Danville) support full equality. All three will face tough General Election contests against opponents who do not. If we win in these key battleground districts, we will pick up even greater support in the Legislature for the LGBT community. What does it all mean? We can take a collective sigh of relief. Equality will continue to prevail in 2009, and the LGBT Caucus lives on. But our work is far from done as we move into the General and map out a path to success for emerging LGBT leaders beyond this year’s election contests.

6 in 10 Americans support the freedom to marry?!

According to a surprising survey by USA Today, 63% of respondents look at marriage as “strictly a private decision”.

Even after a Field Poll last month showing a majority of Californians supporting the freedom to marry, these results are nonetheless unexpected—though quite welcome.

California Supreme Court denies stay of its historic decision on marriage!

You heard it here, first.

Get ready for June 17!

Stay tuned...

:: Press release from the court.

Tuesday, June 3, 2008

UN High Commissioner for Human Rights criticizes states’ records on lesbians and gays

…Albeit, on her way out.

Still in a body where such talk is often regarded as taboo, Lousie Arbour’s impassioned plea is still bound to ruffle some feathers.

“[The] perpetuation of prejudices continues to deny equal rights and dignity to millions worldwide on the basis of nothing more innocuous than their sexual identity or orientation.”

Read.

In California we face a monumental struggle this summer, but it’s important to remember struggles around the world, where LGBT people face even more of an uphill struggle, and where fledgling equality movements have little to no momentum.

Thanks, Louise!

…Albeit, on her way out. Still in a body where such talk is often regarded as taboo, Lousie Arbour’s impassioned plea is still bound to ruffle some feathers. <blockquote style="font-style: italic;">“[The] perpetuation of prejudices continues to deny equal rights and dignity to millions worldwide on the basis of nothing more innocuous than their sexual identity or orientation.”</blockquote> <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/02/AR2008060200829.html">Read.</a> In California we face a monumental struggle this summer, but it’s important to remember struggles around the world, where LGBT people face even more of an uphill struggle, and where fledgling equality movements have little to no momentum. Thanks, Louise!

Across the nation

:: Kentucky
Lesbian and gay state employees receive protections from governor. Read.

:: West Virginia
Marriage to go on ballot? Read.

:: Maryland
Supporters of transgender rights challenge a discriminatory referendum. Read.

:: Kentucky Lesbian and gay state employees receive protections from governor. <a href="http://www.courier-journal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080603/NEWS0101/806030385">Read.</a> :: West Virginia Marriage to go on ballot? <a href="http://www.herald-dispatch.com/homepage/x996203787">Read.</a><a href="http://www.herald-dispatch.com/homepage/x996203787"> </a> :: Maryland Supporters of transgender rights challenge a discriminatory referendum. <a href="http://www.fredericknewspost.com/sections/news/displayUpdate.htm?StoryID=75802">Read.</a>

Vote

This election is supposed to have record-low turn out. That’s bad.

However, if enough LGBT-friendly voters show up to the polls, they can use this opportunity to elect LGBT-friendly politicians, and secure a strong LGBT Caucus.

Voters are cranky right now, but there’s plenty to be hopeful for.

So get in there before the polls close.

:: EQCA-endorsed candidates

This election is supposed to have <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2008/06/02/politics/p131015D47.DTL">record-low turn out</a>. That’s bad. However, if enough LGBT-friendly voters show up to the polls, they can use this opportunity to elect LGBT-friendly politicians, and secure a strong LGBT Caucus. <a href="http://www.sacbee.com/111/story/983795.html">Voters are cranky right now</a>, but there’s plenty to be hopeful for. So get in there before the polls close. :: <a href="http://www.eqca.org/atf/cf/%7B34f258b3-8482-4943-91cb-08c4b0246a88%7D/EQCAPAC%20VOTER%20GUIDE%202008%20PRIM%20.PDF">EQCA-endorsed candidates</a>

Ballot initiative language out-of-date

Notice something?

LIMIT ON MARRIAGE. CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.
Amends the California Constitution to provide that only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local government: The measure would have no fiscal effect on state or local governments. This is because there would be no change to the manner in which marriages are currently recognized by the state. (emphasis mine)

This initiative would in fact change the manner in which marriages are currently recognized by the state, significantly.

Its potential fiscal impact on the government is unclear, but it would most likely put a damper on the economy.

The real question now is what this dramatic inconsistency will mean. Is the ballot initiative even valid anymore?

Notice something? <blockquote>LIMIT ON MARRIAGE. CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Amends the California Constitution to provide that only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local government: The measure would have no fiscal effect on state or local governments. This is because there would be no change to the manner in which marriages are currently recognized by the state. (emphasis mine)</blockquote> This initiative would in fact change the manner in which marriages are currently recognized by the state, significantly. Its potential fiscal impact on the government is unclear, but it would most likely put a <a href="http://ca-ripple-effect.blogspot.com/2008/06/marriage-boon-to-californias-economy.html">damper on the economy</a>. The real question now is what this dramatic inconsistency will mean. Is the ballot initiative even valid anymore?

Monday, June 2, 2008

Secretary of State Debra Bowen certifies marriage ban for November ballot

We knew it was coming, but this breaking news is truly heart-breaking.

This means that the rights of some will—for sure, without a doubt—be put up for a majority vote this coming November 4 election.

If approved, the following initiative would enshrine discrimination into the California constitution by defining marriage as solely “between a man and a woman”:

LIMIT ON MARRIAGE. CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.
Amends the California Constitution to provide that only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local government: The measure would have no fiscal effect on state or local governments. This is because there would be no change to the manner in which marriages are currently recognized by the state.
(Initiative 07-0068.)

:: Read the press release from Debra Bowen, CA Secretary of State

We knew it was coming, but this breaking news is truly heart-breaking. This means that the rights of some will—for sure, without a doubt—be put up for a majority vote this coming November 4 election. If approved, the following initiative would enshrine discrimination into the California constitution by defining marriage as solely “between a man and a woman”: <blockquote>LIMIT ON MARRIAGE. CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Amends the California Constitution to provide that only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local government: The measure would have no fiscal effect on state or local governments. This is because there would be no change to the manner in which marriages are currently recognized by the state. (Initiative 07-0068.)</blockquote> :: <a href="http://www.sos.ca.gov/executive/press_releases/2008/DB08_068.pdf">Read the press release from Debra Bowen, CA Secretary of State</a>

Monday marriage Round-up

:: Wisconsin judge upholds constitutional ban on the freedom to marry. The ban also prohibits anything "substantially similar to marriage."

With this kind of language on the books, it opens the door for the kind of injustice that happened in Michigan earlier this year, where a court took away health benefits from all state employees, including those in the university system.

:: Mixed reaction to marriage in Harlem, where Gov. Paterson made his name.

:: Another public servant forcing his religious beliefs on the citizenry, by refusing to grant marriage licenses to same-gender couples and treat all people equally. This time it’s in Canada.

:: A diversity of religious perspectives on the freedom to marry.

:: Wisconsin <a href="http://www.madison.com/tct/news/stories/288960">judge upholds constitutional ban</a> on the freedom to marry. The ban also prohibits anything "substantially similar to marriage." With this kind of language on the books, it opens the door for the kind of <a href="http://ca-ripple-effect.blogspot.com/2008/05/marriage-round-up.html">injustice that happened in Michigan</a> earlier this year, where a court took away health benefits from all state employees, including those in the university system. :: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/02/nyregion/02gay.html?_r=1&scp=3&sq=gay&st=nyt&oref=slogin">Mixed reaction to marriage in Harlem, where Gov. Paterson made his name.</a> :: Another public servant forcing his religious beliefs on the citizenry, by <a href="http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5jbdJixmOP9AdJOnDR_o00cYYMeZw">refusing to grant marriage licenses</a> to same-gender couples and treat all people equally. This time it’s in <a href="http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5jbdJixmOP9AdJOnDR_o00cYYMeZw">Canada</a>. :: <a href="http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/features/20080531-9999-1c31samesex.html">A diversity of religious perspectives on the freedom to marry.</a>

Don’t forget to vote tomorrow

Um, we know there’s a lot going on, but there’s actually an election tomorrow. Be there.

If you have a mail-in ballot, you can drop it off at any polling place.

Electing pro-LGBT representatives is absolutely critical. Here’s a guide to the candidates you can trust. 100%.

Marriage a boon to California’s economy

“Forget economic stimulus checks. Same-sex marriages may give California just the financial boost it needs.” LA Times

$1 Billion?!!

Some estimate that same-gender weddings and ceremonies generate about that much a year. The Williams Institute predicts a $370 million boost to California’s finances over the next three years—IF lesbians and gays are still free to marry after November.

Though the Williams Institute has also shown that LGBT people make less money on average than their straight counterparts, everyone is expecting same-gender couples to spend big this summer.

BTW, a great way to celebrate this historic occasion is by registering your wedding with EQCA Issues PAC. Wedding Registry coming soon…

<blockquote>“Forget economic stimulus checks. Same-sex marriages may give California just the financial boost it needs.” <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-fi-wedding2-2008jun02,0,5891306.story?page=1">LA Times</a></blockquote><a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-fi-wedding2-2008jun02,0,5891306.story?page=1"></a> $1 Billion?!! Some estimate that same-gender weddings and ceremonies generate about that much a year. The Williams Institute predicts a <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-fi-wedding2-2008jun02,0,5891306.story?page=1">$370 million boost to California’s finances</a> over the next three years—IF lesbians and gays are still free to marry after November. Though the <a href="http://www.law.ucla.edu/WilliamsInstitute/home.html">Williams Institute</a> has also shown that LGBT people make less money on average than their straight counterparts, everyone is expecting same-gender <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-fi-wedding2-2008jun02,0,5891306.story?page=1">couples to spend big this summer</a>. BTW, a great way to celebrate this historic occasion is by registering your wedding with EQCA Issues PAC. Wedding Registry coming soon…

Alliance Defense Fund will sue New York over recognition of marriages from out of state

:: Read the story.

This is annoying, but legal experts say that opponents challenging Governor Paterson’s directive have few options.

Paterson has said he’s only bringing state agencies into compliance with the decision of an appellate court, and honoring New York’s traditional commitment to observe marriage and contracts made in other states.

Brian Raum, senior legal counsel for the Alliance Defense Fund is accusing the Governor’s office of violating the separation of powers. However, the latest word from the courts is that New York must honor marriages from other jurisdictions, and the legislature isn’t even acting on this issue, so who is the Governor usurping power from?

The Arizona-based Christian organization has also been meddling in California, helping lead the charge for a discriminatory ballot initiative.

:: <a href="http://www.ny1.com/ny1/content/index.jsp?stid=3&aid=82221">Read the story.</a> This is annoying, but legal experts say that <a href="http://www.newsday.com/news/local/state/ny-stgay315708509may31,0,7355017.story">opponents challenging Governor Paterson’s directive have few options.</a> Paterson has said he’s only bringing state agencies into compliance with the decision of an appellate court, and honoring New York’s traditional commitment to observe marriage and contracts made in other states. Brian Raum, senior legal counsel for the Alliance Defense Fund is <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/31/nyregion/31marriage.html?scp=17&sq=gay&st=nyt">accusing the Governor’s office of violating the separation of powers</a>. However, the latest word from the courts is that New York must honor marriages from other jurisdictions, and the legislature isn’t even acting on this issue, so who is the Governor usurping power from? The Arizona-based Christian organization has also been meddling in California, helping lead the charge for a discriminatory ballot initiative.

The call for a stay now coming from other states, too

Mind your own business!

10 state attorneys general wrote a letter to the California Supreme Court asking them to delay their decision until the November election. And Jerry Brown’s all “no thanks!”

Alaska, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Michigan, Nebraska, New Hampshire, South Carolina, South Dakota, and Utah all have laws limiting marriage to between one man and one woman.

All but Florida and New Hampshire have constitutional amendments banning the freedom to marry.

Idaho, Michigan, Nebraska, South Carolina, South Dakota and Utah have laws which effectively ban anything remotely resembling marriage for same-gender couples—including civil unions and domestic partnerships.

:: Map of statewide marriage prohibitions from HRC.

So what’s the worry?

Mind your own business! <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/31/us/31gay.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1"> </a><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/31/us/31gay.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1">10 state attorneys general</a> wrote a letter to the California Supreme Court asking them to delay their decision until the November election. And Jerry Brown’s all “<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/31/us/31gay.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1">no thanks!</a>” Alaska, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Michigan, Nebraska, New Hampshire, South Carolina, South Dakota, and Utah all have laws limiting marriage to between one man and one woman. All but Florida and New Hampshire have constitutional amendments banning the freedom to marry. Idaho, Michigan, Nebraska, South Carolina, South Dakota and Utah have laws which effectively ban anything remotely resembling marriage for same-gender couples—including civil unions and domestic partnerships. :: <a href="http://www.hrc.org/documents/marriage_prohibitions.pdf">Map of statewide marriage prohibitions from HRC.</a> So what’s the worry?

County Clerk is angling for 1st Place

Stephen Weir has been granting marriage licenses in Contra Costa County for 18 years, but has been unable to get married himself. That all will change June 17.

Read more.